The Tricky Issue Of Problem Gambling

31 August 2017
ShareSave


Dearbail JordanBusiness reporter


For David Bradford, his gambling dependency had actually got as bad as it perhaps could.


The 57 year-old remained in prison for fraud after taking ₤ 50,000. His routine had cost his household their home and left them buried under ₤ 500,000 of financial obligation.


For 888. com, however, there was more to be had out of David Bradford.


While he sat in jail, his boy Adam saw that the online gambling company was sending adverts to his daddy's mobile phone, at a cost of ₤ 5 a time.


Adam Bradford says: "After calling them six times and pleading with them, they switched off the text after practically ₤ 100 worth of charges."


Dr Carolyn Downs, senior speaker at Lancaster University who is a specialist on the betting market, estimates that there are around 500,000 people in the UK with a "serious" addition.


"And for each of those individuals with serious issues, you're looking at four or 5 other family members being badly impacted. Who possibly do not understand that their member of the family is an issue gambler up until they lose the home," she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.


Theft


On Thursday, 888 Holdings, which owns 888. com, was fined a record ₤ 7.8 m by the Gambling Commission for stopping working to safeguard countless vulnerable customers who had attempted to "self-exclude" themselves from their sites.


The regulator also punished 888 for stopping working to recognise problem behaviour that led to a single person taking ₤ 55,000 from their employer.


Sarah Harrison, primary executive of the regulator, said: "Messages like this send out a strong signal to companies like 888 and every gaming operator that the Gambling Commission will take tough action versus companies who do not fulfill the guidelines."


However, the Gambling Commission would not have actually learnt about any of these issues had 888 Holdings not advance in the first location.


In the regulator's public declaration on the matter, it states that it was 888 Holdings who alerted the commission about the technical issue on 28 February 2017.


Asked how it guarantees that gambling companies are following a code of practice which needs them to put self-exclusion procedures in location in addition to identifying at risk clients, the regulator, said: "The commission performs regular compliance activity in a number of ways.


"In addition, we in some cases act on info from clients or operators themselves that triggers us to perform an investigation, as in this case."


Self-exclusion or delusion?


In 888's case, the fault lay with a technical issue.


Customers with acknowledged issues had successfully obstructed themselves from gambling on the poker, casino and sports websites.


But they still had access to the bingo websites.


However, even with this loophole now closed, there remains a broader industry issue with self-exclusion, states Dr Downs.


She stated: "It was difficult to do with online gambling, even to find a put on a site to really go to tell them you want to self-exclude ... it rather frequently requires a horrible lot of clicks with a mouse around the website to discover a location."


And just because an individual is excluded from one ways of gambling, it does not provide any protection versus other techniques.


In some instances, self-exclusion is just farcical.


Tony Franklin, a recovering gaming addict and an advocate, says: "Self-exclusion from betting shops is paper-based so they are reliant on you providing a photograph of yourself. Then, it might just be distributed to a little number of betting shops in the location."


It is really easy to go to another town to wager, he says, and it is really tough for the individuals operating in bookies to police their consumers.


Dr Downs proposed a nationwide register for self-exclusion: "The Gambling Commission might run this," she says: "If you wished to self-exclude you would send your details off on a simple kind to the Gambling Commission and they would let everybody know your e-mail address."


But she includes: "I don't believe there's any sort of will for that action. Problem gamblers offer most of the earnings for the betting market and that's actually quite well known."


The Gambling Commission states the industry is dealing with a national "online multi-operator self-exclusion scheme" which it is intends to have in location by 2018.


At the moment, consumers must to each specific site to ask the company not to enable them to gamble. The commission states: "The brand-new plan will enable customers to self-exclude from all online licensed betting operators via one web website."


GAMSTOP, as it is called, will be run by the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), a group whose members are online gaming companies.


Adam Bradford questions the wisdom of this. "It resembles asking a policeman to detain himself for a crime."


Clive Hawkswood, chief executive of the RGA, denies that there is a dispute of interest. "On the contrary it is quite in our interests and our goal is to make it as great as any system in the world," he states.


The Gambling Commission says: "We think about an industry-led and handled service is finest placed to provide an efficient and efficient scheme by structure, in specific, on the and expertise in the market of developing and managing big IT options, in addition to administering current self-exclusion plans."


Mr Franklin believes betting companies need to take stronger action before allowing individuals to wager, such as conducting a price check on potential consumers.


This, he believes, ought to be contracted out to a 3rd celebration such as credit checking company Experian.


Liberalising issues


At the moment, nevertheless, Mr Franklin states individuals will remain susceptible to an industry whose main goal is to make cash.


Dr Downs says: "I think legislation is absolutely the only answer. I think when we liberalised the gambling industry - as was forecasted by a number of people at the time - we liberalised many more issue gamblers."


For Mr Franklin, he states: "Never again. Not ever will I give one more pound to these individuals."


888 Holdings decreased to comment on individual cases. Its action to the action taken by the Gambling Commission can be accessed here.